Laminar Micromixing Simulator: Diffusion in Microchannels

simulator beginner ~10 min
Loading simulation...
η ≈ 72% — mixing efficiency over 20 mm channel

A 100 μm wide channel with 5 mm/s flow velocity achieves approximately 72% mixing efficiency over 20 mm, with a Péclet number of 500 indicating convection-dominated transport.

Formula

Pe = v × w / D (Péclet number)
L_mix ≈ w × Pe / 4 (required mixing length)
η = 1 - exp(-4DL / (vw²)) (mixing efficiency)

Laminar Flow and the Mixing Challenge

In microchannels, the Reynolds number is typically below 1, ensuring perfectly laminar flow. Two streams entering a Y-shaped junction flow side by side in parallel laminae with no turbulent eddies to stir them together. The only mechanism for mixing is molecular diffusion — the random thermal motion of molecules across the interface between the streams. This makes microfluidic mixing fundamentally different from macroscale mixing.

Diffusion Physics and the Péclet Number

The Péclet number Pe = vw/D quantifies the competition between convective transport (carrying molecules downstream) and diffusive transport (spreading molecules laterally). When Pe is large, molecules travel far downstream before diffusing across the channel width. The required mixing length scales as L_mix ~ wPe, meaning faster flows or wider channels demand proportionally longer mixers. For a protein (D ~ 10⁻¹¹ m²/s) in a 100 μm channel at 1 mm/s, Pe exceeds 10,000.

Concentration Profiles

The concentration profile across the channel evolves from a sharp step function at the inlet to a smooth gradient and eventually a uniform distribution. The analytical solution involves a series of complementary error functions, but the key insight is that the diffusion distance grows as the square root of time. Halving the channel width reduces mixing time by a factor of four, explaining why narrow channels mix so much faster.

Engineering Solutions

Because pure diffusion is slow for large biomolecules, engineers have developed clever passive and active mixing strategies. The staggered herringbone mixer uses patterned ridges to create chaotic advection, folding and stretching fluid elements to exponentially increase the interfacial area. Split-and-recombine mixers repeatedly divide and rejoin the flow, halving the striation thickness at each stage. These approaches can reduce mixing lengths from meters to millimeters.

FAQ

Why is mixing difficult in microchannels?

At the microscale, flow is almost always laminar (low Reynolds number), meaning there is no turbulent mixing. Two streams flowing side by side can only mix through molecular diffusion, which is slow for large molecules. This is both a challenge (long mixing lengths) and an opportunity (precise control of concentration gradients).

What is the Péclet number in microfluidics?

The Péclet number Pe = vw/D compares convective transport to diffusive transport. High Pe means the fluid moves much faster than molecules can diffuse across the channel, requiring long channels for complete mixing. Low Pe means diffusion is fast enough to mix efficiently over short distances.

How can mixing be enhanced in laminar flow?

Strategies include chaotic advection via herringbone ridges (staggered herringbone mixer), split-and-recombine geometries that repeatedly halve the diffusion distance, Dean flow in curved channels, acoustic streaming, and electrokinetic instabilities. Each reduces the effective mixing length dramatically.

What is the mixing time in a microchannel?

The characteristic diffusion time scales as t ~ w²/D, where w is the channel width and D is the diffusion coefficient. For a 100 μm channel with D = 10⁻⁹ m²/s (small molecule), mixing takes about 2.5 seconds. For proteins (D ~ 10⁻¹¹ m²/s), it takes 250 seconds — motivating the use of active or chaotic mixers.

Sources

Embed

<iframe src="https://homo-deus.com/lab/microfluidics/laminar-mixing/embed" width="100%" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe>
View source on GitHub