Indicator Kriging: Probability Mapping for Resource Classification

simulator advanced ~12 min
Loading simulation...
40% area above cutoff — indicator kriging at z_c = 3 g/t

With 20 samples and 40% global proportion above the 3 g/t cutoff, indicator kriging maps the probability of exceedance across the domain. Red zones have high probability (P>0.7), blue zones have low probability (P<0.3).

Formula

I(x; z_c) = 1 if Z(x) ≥ z_c, 0 otherwise
P*(x₀; z_c) = Σ λᵢ I(xᵢ; z_c) where Σ λᵢ = 1
γ_I(h) = C₀ + C[1.5(h/a) − 0.5(h/a)³] for indicator variable

From Values to Probabilities

Indicator kriging transforms the interpolation problem from estimating continuous values to estimating probabilities. Instead of asking 'what is the grade at this location?', it asks 'what is the probability that the grade exceeds a critical threshold?' This shift is powerful because many real decisions are binary — is this block ore or waste? Is this soil contaminated or clean? Is this aquifer polluted or safe? Indicator kriging answers these questions directly, without assuming the data follows any particular distribution.

The Indicator Transform

The method begins by converting each sample value into a binary indicator: 1 if the value exceeds the cutoff, 0 if it does not. This simple transform eliminates the influence of extreme high values (outliers) that plague ordinary kriging of skewed distributions like gold grades. An indicator variogram is then fitted to these 0/1 data, capturing how the spatial pattern of above/below-cutoff zones varies with distance. The indicator variogram is typically shorter-ranged than the value variogram because it captures boundary geometry rather than gradual trends.

Probability Mapping

Ordinary kriging of the indicator variable produces estimated probabilities between 0 and 1 at every unsampled location. In this simulation, the probability surface is displayed as a heat map — red indicates high probability of exceeding the cutoff (P > 0.7), blue indicates low probability (P < 0.3), and yellow/green indicates the uncertain boundary zone near P = 0.5. The uncertainty index quantifies how confidently the domain can be classified: values near 0.5 everywhere indicate poor resolution, while values near 0 or 1 indicate clear classification.

Multiple Indicator Kriging

The full power of indicator kriging emerges when applied at multiple cutoffs simultaneously. By estimating P(Z > z_c) at several thresholds, the complete conditional cumulative distribution function (ccdf) is recovered at each location. This ccdf provides not just the most likely value but the full range of uncertainty — the probability of any value occurring. This is the basis for probabilistic resource classification, risk-based environmental remediation, and conditional simulation in geostatistics.

FAQ

What is indicator kriging?

Indicator kriging transforms continuous data into binary indicators (1 if above cutoff, 0 if below) and applies kriging to estimate the probability of exceeding the cutoff at unsampled locations. It is a non-parametric approach that makes no assumption about the underlying data distribution.

Why use indicator kriging instead of ordinary kriging?

Indicator kriging directly estimates probabilities and can handle skewed distributions, outliers, and multiple cutoffs without assuming normality. It is ideal for ore/waste classification, contamination mapping, and any problem framed as 'what is the probability this location exceeds a threshold?'

What is the indicator variogram?

The indicator variogram models the spatial correlation of the binary indicator variable. It captures how the probability of being above/below the cutoff changes with distance. Different cutoffs produce different indicator variograms — the full set defines the spatial distribution.

How is indicator kriging used in mining?

In mining, indicator kriging at the economic cutoff grade produces probability maps for ore/waste classification. A block with P(Z > cutoff) > 0.5 is classified as ore. The probability values also support risk analysis — blocks with P near 0.5 are uncertain and may be misclassified.

Sources

Embed

<iframe src="https://homo-deus.com/lab/geostatistics/indicator-kriging/embed" width="100%" height="400" frameborder="0"></iframe>
View source on GitHub